WOBBLstrut.py

Does this aluminum strut carry 7 kN with a factor of 3 against buckling?

Buckling report
2026-10-15 19:00
MARGINAL

Buckles at 3.25 times the applied load (22767 N) in a column mode. With a knockdown of 0.81 for imperfections and yielding the design factor is 2.64 against a target of 3.

buckling factor
3.25
knockdown
0.81
design factor
2.64
target
3

Confidence high

  • passed mesh convergence, force balance, hand calculation, mode separation, yield before buckling, units and sanity

Simulation

First buckling mode, deflection exaggerated
First buckling mode, deflection exaggerated
The next buckling modes
The next buckling modes
First buckling factor on each mesh
First buckling factor on each mesh

Checks

statuscheckresult
passmesh convergencefirst buckling factor settled: 3.25 -> 3.25 times the load over 2 meshes, last change 0.0%
passforce balancereactions balance the loads to 4.2e-05% (forces) and 3.7e-06% (moments)
passhand calculationEuler's column, clamped at the base and pinned at the loaded end (K = 0.699), with I = 5838 mm4 over 600 mm gives 22570 N, a factor of 3.22, and the finite element factor is 3.25 (+0.9%)
passmode separationthe first factor repeats, the same buckle in two directions of a symmetric section, and the next distinct mode is at 9.42, 2.90 times the first
passyield before bucklingthe most stressed point (50.9 MPa von Mises stress at the reference load, away from the supports) reaches 276 MPa at 5.42 times the load, after it buckles, so buckling governs
passunits and sanitybuckling factor 3.25, deflection 0.381 mm under the reference load (0.063% of size): plausible

How to fix it

Raise the column's second moment of area 1.2 times
The elastic buckling load scales with I, now 5838 mm4 about the weak axis. On the column curve the design factor reaches 3 at 1.2 times that, a section 1.04 times as wide in every direction, or a larger tube of the same weight, which puts the material farther from the axis.
Shorten the unbraced length to 553 mm
The elastic buckling load scales with 1/L^2, so 553 mm of the 600 mm column reaches the target. A brace that stops sideways motion at mid length halves the buckling length and does far more.
Use a stiffer material
Elastic buckling scales with Young's modulus, 68900 MPa now, so a material 1.2 times as stiff reaches the target if it is also strong enough not to yield first.

Buckling factors

Negative factors buckle the part only with every load reversed.

modefactorload N
13.2522767
23.2522767
39.4265926
49.4265928

Assumptions

  1. Linear eigenvalue buckling, where the stiffness the loads take away is found from the stress they cause in the perfect, undeformed part, and the loads keep their direction as it deflects. It overpredicts the collapse load of real parts, most of all for thin shells, which is what the knockdown is for.
  2. The shape class is column, a straight member 600 mm long pushed along its length, slenderness L/r 99, and the knockdown comes from EN 1999-1-1 class A alloys (imperfection factor 0.2), whose relative slenderness of 1.39 keeps 0.419 of the squash load of 44138 N.
  3. Aluminum 6061-T6: E 68900 MPa, Poisson 0.33, von Mises vs yield 276 MPa (ASM Aerospace Specification Metals, Aluminum 6061-T6).
  4. The design factor also counts crookedness, eccentricity and yielding, through the column curve.
  5. Fixed faces are perfectly rigid. A support that gives a little, or turns, lowers the buckling load, and for a column that is clamped on paper it can lower it by half or more.
  6. Wrought metal treated as isotropic; rolled, drawn or extruded stock is close to it at yield.

Notes