Antenna 2.4 GHz

You ask

Is this 58 mm dipole tuned for 2.4 GHz, and does the link reach across a 25 m office?

Wobbl runs

Terminal
$ wobbl simulate dipole "Is this 58 mm dipole tuned for 2.4 GHz, and does the link reach across a 25 m office?" \  --physics antenna --set frequency=2.44GHz --set length=58mm \  --set diameter=1mm --set points=11 --set tx_power=10dBm \  --set sensitivity=-92dBm --set environment=office --set distance=25m
The the dipole at the frequency you pick, as the run left it at 2,440 MHz

Frequency 2,440 MHz

peak magnetic field

0.0638 A/m

OK

S11 -12.7 dB, power taken in 94.6 %

Open the full report

Checks, numbers and charts

OKThe 58 mm dipole resonates at 2395 MHz (-1.8% from 2440 MHz), with 77.5 + j11.5 ohm and S11 of -12.6 dB against 50 ohm at 2440 MHz. Peak gain 2.14 dBi. At 25 m the median received power is -67.4 dBm, 24.6 dB above the -92 dBm sensitivity, and the link holds out to 61.8 m in 90% of spots and 165 m in half of them (office).

Resonance
2,395 MHz
S11
-12.6 dB
Impedance
77.5 + j11.5 ohm
Confidence
medium
  • passmesh convergence
  • passboundary distance
  • passpower balance
  • passpattern power
  • passclosed form
  • passfree space bound
  • infolink uncertainty
summary.txt
OK. The 58 mm dipole resonates at 2395 MHz (-1.8% from 2440 MHz), with 77.5 + j11.5 ohm and S11 of -12.6 dB against 50 ohm at 2440 MHz. Peak gain 2.14 dBi. At 25 m the median received power is -67.4 dBm, 24.6 dB above the -92 dBm sensitivity, and the link holds out to 61.8 m in 90% of spots and 165 m in half of them (office). Confidence: medium. the range comes from an empirical path loss model with 10 dB of shadowingresonance: 2395 MHzS11: -12.6 dBimpedance: 77.5 + j11.5 ohmgain: 2.14 dBirange, 90%: 61.8 m Checks:  [pass] mesh convergence: input impedance magnitude settled: 78.3 -> 78.4 ohm over 2 meshes, last change 0.1%  [pass] boundary distance: moving the absorbing boundary half again as far out changes the impedance from 77.5 + j11.4 ohm to 77.4 + j11.6 ohm (0.31%)  [pass] power balance: power fed in at the gap 12.6 mW, power leaving through the outer boundary 12.6 mW (5.4e-08% apart)  [pass] pattern power: the radiation integral of the current along the wire gives 24.6 mW against 25.3 mW fed to the full dipole (2.7% apart)  [pass] closed form: resonance at 2395 MHz with 72.8 ohm, against 73.1 ohm for a thin half wave dipole (0.35% apart). Induced EMF theory puts this length at 61.9 + j4.68 ohm at 2440 MHz, the field solve 77.5 + j11.4 ohm  [pass] free space bound: the office model's median range 165 m is within the free space limit 2016 m  [info] link uncertainty: shadow fading of 10 dB moves the range from 165 m (half the spots) to 61.8 m (90% of spots), and a power loss coefficient 3 lower or higher gives 104 to 291 m Assumptions:  - Solved with the axisymmetric model, no 3D solve was needed. A straight wire is a body of revolution, so the axisymmetric full wave solve is exact for it. Give a finite ground plate or put the antenna near something and it is solved in 3D.  - Center fed dipole in free space, wire diameter 1 mm, fed across a 1 mm gap (delta gap).  - Axisymmetric full wave solve, and the outer boundary absorbs outgoing waves to first order.  - Copper conductor loss from the skin effect, 0.15% of the power. No feed line, balun or nearby objects.  - Path loss from the ITU-R P.1238 site general indoor model (power loss coefficient 30, 10 dB shadow fading, for a typical office) at 2440 MHz.  - Link budget 10.0 dBm out, 2.14 dBi and 2.14 dBi antennas, 0.0 dB of other losses, -92.0 dBm sensitivity, and a fading margin of 12.8 dB for 90% of spots. Images: s11: images/s11.png, impedance: images/impedance.png, pattern: images/pattern.png, range: images/range.pngReport: report.html

Run it yourself

Terminal
$ git clone https://github.com/sohan-bhat/wobbl$ cd wobbl/examples/antenna-2g4 && ./run.sh

The part, the script and every output are in examples/antenna-2g4 on GitHub.